View Single Post
Old 01-11-2020, 09:07 PM   #158
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,431
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hildea View Post
Milan has explained her view at length in her response to Davis' complaint, starting at the bottom of page 2.
But isn't exoticizing lovers a lot of what the genre is about?

Real-life dukes and duchesses might have a lot more reason to dislike the genre than do the Chinese. But I very much doubt the vast number of titles, where earls are an object of fascination, whips up a generalized hatred against the nobility, much less anti-British animus.

In the spirit of Milan's admission that she reached her conclusion after only reading a part of a sample, I should myself admit to not being a reader of novels unambiguously fitting into the romance genre ouvre. This post has a family resemblance to ideas in this book, which I did completely read:

How to Talk About Books You Haven't Read
SteveEisenberg is online now   Reply With Quote