Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle91
True, but the stated purpose for the OP was:
Reports does that very well...AND...allows you to DO something with the info, not just get a list of problems.
|
The started puposec was "images
and pages" and the latter is handled better in FC.
If it would have been only images i would agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinH
Please no fc vs epubcheck religious wars. They are only in competition for epub2 and even then they do check different things.
|
Thanks Kevin. We are talking about not used files. Not used files do not make an epub invalid, its not against the spec, so irrelevant for epub chec. And reports do not cover all unused files FC is detecting. FC seems to be a Pawlow issue for some.