[fjtorres]

Originally Posted by hildea

I'm a bit surprised at some of the replies here, especially the ones that seem to support Davis. I mean:

1. Someone writes a book
2. Someone else writes a harsh review
3. The author files a formal ethics complaint against the reviewer

...and some people here support the author in that conflict?

.

Do note that it is a twenty year old book.
(And a historical fiction book set in the 19th century.)

And the critics went after the author's new employer, personally.

Does that seem normal?

Me, I couldn't care less but it all smacks of ulterior motives.