View Single Post
Old 01-02-2020, 06:30 PM   #22
cfrizz
Wizard
cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cfrizz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
cfrizz's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,570
Karma: 36389706
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Quincy, MA
Device: Samsung 54A, Kobo Libra H2O, Samsung S6 Lite
Quote:
Originally Posted by hildea View Post


I've tried rereading some of the romances I loved as a teenager in the 80s, and they've aged even worse than the SF I loved at that time. They really were horribly rapey.

Romance has changed a lot in the last forty years, though. If you like regency romances and are interested in seeing where the genre is now, I suggest checking out "The Governess Affair" by Courtney Milan, it's a free novella, so it won't require a huge investment of time or money.
Agreed, I got into romance by reading early Fern Michaels, I can no longer read/stomach those books, and she no longer writes those kinds of books. But that was the style back then.

Fortunately, as you said romance has come a long way since then and I hope very few are writing those kinds of books now. But I have since moved on to a different genre of romance.

As for the claim itself, I have no doubt that minority writers of all persuasions are marginalized where ever they can be within big organizations. This will shine a light on it, and hopefully things will change for the better.
cfrizz is offline   Reply With Quote