View Single Post
Old 01-01-2020, 03:41 PM   #100
Quoth
Still reading
Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Quoth's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,440
Karma: 107078855
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper
Quote:
Originally Posted by stumped View Post
If a company wants to make life difficult for pirates, then streaming , plus android only is the way to go.
And be totally obnoxious making the content difficult for ordinary users. I think Mills & Boone/Harlequin has done this. As a publisher I would NEVER EVER give exclusivity to such parasites.
Subscription & and Streaming only services are parasites and exploitive.
Single platform cheats consumers, dampens innovation and feeds monopolies. It's not about protecting copyright, it's about either greed or stupidity.

Those are not moral ways to combat Copyright violation. DRM is wrong and so is the DMCA.
Publishers need to leave consumers alone and only go after industrial pirates. The people that pirate ARC and sell or offer "free" (often there is a sub), or get copies of movies /TV from studio or projection booth.
If you can read, see or hear it, then NO DRM, even unbroken DRM can protect it. It's fantasy that streaming prevent pirates. It only removes flexibility for ordinary consumers.
Quoth is offline   Reply With Quote