View Single Post
Old 12-30-2019, 02:08 PM   #38
leebase
Karma Kameleon
leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
leebase's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,973
Karma: 26738313
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
Please, please, please stop suggesting that Amazon was losing any money whatsoever on their ebooks when they were their in "$9.99 for some bestsellers" phase. It's false, misleading and, quite frankly, ignorant.
It's neither of any of those things.

From the ruling: After some weeks, Apple and several publishers devised a new model fore-book distribution. Amazon had been paying a wholesale price for each e-book,and reselling (often at a loss) for a retail price of its choosing. Apple’sdistribution contracts would adopt an agency system: publishers would set theretail prices of e-books sold through Apple’s platform and Apple would take afixed-percent commission on each sale


https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-doc...24326/download
leebase is offline   Reply With Quote