View Single Post
Old 12-25-2019, 06:08 PM   #24
rcentros
eReader Wrangler
rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rcentros's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,894
Karma: 52566355
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Voyage, Clara HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Why is it nobody will say what it is they want privacy from? I'm asking because I'm interested.
At one time it was assumed that a business transaction between you and any company was private — that third party entities weren't entitled to personal information about you (via information purchase or other means). That a warrant was needed to obtain information about those who were suspected of committing a crime.

They even wrote an amendment to the U.S. Constitution about this...

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. — 4th Amendment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_privacy
rcentros is online now   Reply With Quote