Thread: Silliness Question Everything?
View Single Post
Old 03-13-2009, 09:56 PM   #628
montsnmags
Grand Sorcerer
montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.montsnmags ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 10,155
Karma: 4632658
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnageddon View Post
Isn't that not questionable?
One would certainly think so, yes? Wouldn't I be more inclined to differentiate my product by not including a negative side effect other products historically incorporated (like the "hangover")? Does one not think that this is, perhaps, why we have a "hangunder" instead? Is Geoff, perhaps, eating something that could only semantically be called a "pill", but is, actually, a Tic Tac? Is Geoff getting high, or low, on candy? Geoff, if so, would you like me to prescribe a pill to combat those effects?
montsnmags is offline   Reply With Quote