View Single Post
Old 12-15-2019, 02:49 PM   #11
Quoth
Still reading
Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Quoth's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,277
Karma: 105299897
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
Exactly so. It's not a 'fill in the blanks', it's just deliberate ambiguity.
Absolutely. Common in 18th C. to early 20th C.
Most common for places and years. Trollope was almost unusual in making up place names. Remember it was hard to check imaginary names really were imaginary till early 20th C. gazetteers in libraries. The Internet existed for 20 years before it could be used reliably to check (it existed for email and file transfer long before the first web sites in early 1990s).

Fill in the blanks (such as swear words) is usually * per letter, the underline or sometimes an em dash doesn't signify any number of letters, it's pure ambiguity, not even a "wildcard".

I'm thinking Robinson Crusoe, early 1719, has this convention for years.

Last edited by Quoth; 12-15-2019 at 02:55 PM. Reason: detail
Quoth is offline   Reply With Quote