|
I'm somewhat at a disadvantage because I've not spent a great deal of time thinking about WHY I don't care for the type of book that WSS is, beyond the simple fact that I don't care for them.
I never said I have the only correct interpretation of Rochester. I said that the Rochester of WSS wouldn't be the same Rochester that was in JE. I guess I need a disclaimer here? It wouldn't be the same Rochester as I understood him.
Honestly, I shared my opinion of this type of work. Nothing less, nothing more. I wasn't looking for a Debate Class. I did feel somewhat talked down to.
|