View Single Post
Old 11-12-2019, 12:34 PM   #27
Jellby
frumious Bandersnatch
Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Jellby's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,561
Karma: 20150435
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spaniard in Sweden
Device: Cybook Orizon, Kobo Aura
I don't think anyone is suggesting changing "dog" for "cat", or to suppress the "n*" word, or to turn "strumpet" into "trumpet".

This whole thing started with "is it Boots' or Boots's?", which is a legitimate question (especially from a non-native speaker). Could it have been a mistake, a misprint, a changing spelling standard, a "smart" spell corrector somewhere in the line from the author to the current electronic source? Answer: No, most probably not, native speakers now and in the writer's time would consider "Boots'" correct. Case solved. No grave robbers around.

If we must be true to the original, we should also use the same font, margins, paper, binding, cover, price, etc. as the first edition... The author sanctioned the book with centered page numbers below the text, who are we to change that?
Jellby is offline   Reply With Quote