View Single Post
Old 11-09-2019, 12:22 PM   #5
Quoth
Still reading
Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Quoth's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,272
Karma: 105299897
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper
No, it's absolutely not the same editing dead author's text as a living one:
1) It's already out
2) They can't agree about changes
3) Readers who read it or have it on paper have reasonable expectations.

Gutenberg and Fadedpage teams both have it right. You do not change author's intent or make it better. Only totally obvious errors of transmission as I explained in last post.

Of course as it's public domain, you can do what you like. Expect howling readers with pitchforks and torches if you "improve" or "correct" the author.

Erring on the side of NOT changing is best.

Formatting / layout has more flexibility, especially for ebooks, which reflow.

One reason that Publishers change fonts, layout and commission new illustrations is that the overall book has then a fresh copyright, though the text itself is in the public domain. Facsimiles of original editions are thus rarely done by publishers.

OCR errors and typesetting errors are pretty clear to an experienced proof reader.
Quoth is offline   Reply With Quote