View Single Post
Old 11-09-2019, 10:22 AM   #468
leebase
Karma Kameleon
leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
leebase's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,975
Karma: 26738313
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
I accept that Sherlock Holmes and Jane Austin works are good examples as counter arguments to my hyperbolic “no one will invest in properties they can’t own”. Of course...one needn’t look past Disney for such examples.

I’d say this in reply....Disney and the folks behind the Holmes shows and movies were willing to invest in pre-existing stories...because they knew their own works would be protected by ownership and the value of the existing works was worth exploiting even though others can equally exploit those same works.
leebase is offline   Reply With Quote