View Single Post
Old 11-04-2019, 07:01 AM   #38
issybird
o saeclum infacetum
issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
issybird's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,366
Karma: 235166015
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: Mini, H2O, Glo HD, Aura One, PW4, PW5
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
My guess is that any net profitability must be marginal -- otherwise more libraries would do it. But it's all speculation.
Of course it's all speculation. Speculation is fun.

Still, at a minimum, there's a lot more potential loss than profit on each individual account. And as you pointed out, as the price of a membership goes up, the more the profitable paid patrons will drop out. I even suspect $50/year is a psychologically important pricing point. "Only a buck a week," even the marginal might think, but that's about as high as they'll go. And once they stop subsidizing the heavy paid users, it's game over.

I don't think thirty books a year is excessive. Some, many even, only read library books. If FLP is their main source (and they've probably joined because of a dire local alternative), easy-peasy. Speaking just for myself and I'm a heavy reader, about a third of my books each year are bought, which puts the remainder of my reads, amounting in the high two figures, sourced elsewhere.
issybird is offline   Reply With Quote