View Single Post
Old 10-31-2019, 10:56 AM   #55
slowsmile
Witchman
slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.slowsmile ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 628
Karma: 788808
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Philippines
Device: Android S5
@jhowell...

Quote:
"My reading of the publishing guidelines section 9.4.2 is that this is a minimum (not an exact value) and only applies to “important images”. Not long after that the guidelines makes exceptions and later gives a minimum of 72 ppi needed to pass conversion. "
What you say is fair enough. But I would urge you to test as advised in my last post because as far as I'm concerned, the images produced from an epub that uses images sized for mobi7(that are smaller than the HDV standard) always gave me blurry images when I tested the epub on KP3. But the images in the KPF file(as HDV compliant images) were much sharper. And if you are going to test this, it's probably best to use image with text like a screen shot or window snip. You should hopefully see that there is a quite difference in the text sharpness bewteen the KPF file and epub.

Last edited by slowsmile; 10-31-2019 at 11:15 AM.
slowsmile is offline   Reply With Quote