Thread: Calibre 4.2
View Single Post
Old 10-23-2019, 08:00 AM   #73
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 79,929
Karma: 146918083
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by deback View Post
Tests just done:

Closed out all programs that were open (at startup and after startup). Installed Calibre 4.2. First edit: Took 5 seconds for the File Viewer to be fully rendered. Subsequent edits: Took 3 seconds for the full rendering.

Booted in Safe Mode, with no networking: First edit: Took 5 seconds for the File Viewer to be fully rendered. Subsequent edits: Took 3 seconds for the full rendering.

Booted in Normal Mode: First edit: Took 5 seconds for the File Viewer to be fully rendered. Subsequent edits: Took 3 seconds for the full rendering.

Next step is to downgrade back to Calibre 3.48. First edit: Will take 0 seconds for the File Viewer to be fully rendered. Subsequent edits: Will take 0 seconds for the full rendering.
The performance you are seeing is actually quite good. And the next version of Calibre will be even faster. So don't give up on 4.2 just yet.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote