View Single Post
Old 10-18-2019, 09:59 AM   #193
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by leebase View Post
There’s a big difference between how a professor or book critic may read into your work themes etc. and another author taking your characters and putting his words into their mouths.
This is the real problem with the "it's property and belongs to the author forever" crowd. Copyright keeps expanding outward and outward. You go from the right to make copies of a book to complete control over any character mentioned in the book.

As was pointed out in the thesis I linked to earlier, this mind set would mean that Virgil, Shakespeare and pretty much any author you have ever heard of would be guilty of copyright violations. J.K. Rowling? Yep, Nicolas Flamel was central to the plot line of the first Harry Potter book. He was both a real person and a figure of legend who was widely written about. The Philosopher's stone? Doesn't really exist, but the legend has been around since around 300 AD. I suppose she could have called him something else, but the knowledge of the legend of Nicolas Flamel was a huge clue to the reader and a major plot device.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote