View Single Post
Old 10-13-2019, 04:01 PM   #107
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,767
Karma: 158733736
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleshuffle View Post
What you don't seem to get is that incorporating the work of others can enhance a work by giving it an extra dimension, one that I, as a reader, cherish. So you want to deprive me of something that means a lot to me. Am I glad that you are not in a position to do that!
Quote:
Since it seems you have never heard of intertextuality, perhaps you should start here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intertextuality
I get that previous works can enhance new ones. What I'm saying is that this type of enhancement is not required for society to progress and if it's desired to progress in this way, then pay the copyright holders for using their works. It's not unreasonable to do so.

Quote:
You also unwittingly support a point I made in the post you found so ridiculous: The eternal copyright you want would kill literature as a form of communication, and thus, in a way, literature itself.
No it won't. Literature will go on and new books will be written.
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote