View Single Post
Old 09-29-2019, 09:38 AM   #27
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,661
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
@KevinH, @DiapDealer,

Remember when I said qtwebengine was a problem for FSDG distributions in Linux-land? Apparently that's not the only place it is a problem.

In fact, I would venture to say that qtwebengine being built from chromium sources, it will be a problem getting qtwebengine on anything other than macOS, Windows, and glibc-using Linux distributions targeting 432-bit or 64-bit intel platforms.
I'm just not able to get too worked up over this. Sigil 0.9.14 works quite well, and anybody who just HAS to have the latest version of Sigil on an OS it can't be built on, can always use it in a VM that DOES support it. I'm quite happy with the current range of distros/platforms/architectures the latest version of Sigil will build on. And I expect that range will only get broader as time goes on.

Situations like this are exactly why forks happen. If it's important enough to someone, they'll make it happen (and share).

Last edited by DiapDealer; 09-29-2019 at 09:42 AM.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote