View Single Post
Old 09-25-2019, 10:27 AM   #29
leebase
Karma Kameleon
leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
leebase's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,975
Karma: 26738313
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.p.s View Post
That wouldn't violate copyright, but the last is fraud and the one before that is plagiarism.
It's not fraud. "Leebase's Frankenstein" would be totally legal with NOTHING changed but the title.

And plagiarism isn't illegal either. Your COLLEGE might levy punishments for breaking THEIR "anti-plagiarism" rules....but it's not a law for general society.

Politicians get dinged for plagiarism all the time....but it's a criticism not a crime.
leebase is offline   Reply With Quote