Quote:
I'm not rich. But I am using Windows 10 because it was a free upgrade. It still can be had for free.
|
The problem isn't the cost of Windows. The problem is I did not grow up with Windows or have Windows systems in school. It is foreign to me, I can not figure out how to be productive in it, it would take classes to learn.
Linux - well, I've been using it since '98 and generally works the same way my mind does. Gnome 3 frustrates the hell out of me, but the MATE developers forked Gnome 2 so I just use that.
Quote:
If you use ADE 2.0.1 to test your glyphs, you'll find out if you need to embed or not.
|
No, I won't. It's quite clear that just like Android phone manufacturers don't use the default Google provided fonts but use their own, that many ePub readers don't use the fonts provided by the Adobe engine (assuming that is what they use, the ePub spec does not require any particular rendering engine) but use their own.
So no, I don't know that just because a glyph is supported in ADE that it will work in every reader out there.
I assume that the Latin-1/Latin-9/Windows 1252 glyphs *mostly* work, with the exception of soft-hyphen which is in all three of those encoding but seems to not be in the fonts
some readers include.
I assume many of the WGL4 glyphs commonly used in English *mostly* work.
But embedding a font is the only way to know for sure the glyphs my content uses is available.