View Single Post
Old 09-19-2019, 03:10 AM   #11
anacreon
Guru
anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.anacreon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
anacreon's Avatar
 
Posts: 975
Karma: 3475832
Join Date: May 2012
Location: France
Device: Elipsa, Sage, Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeera View Post
They are not "the same" apart from size. The Forma has a flexible substrate, meaning it is more drop-resistant and much lighter for its size. The Forma weights 197 grams, the Libra 192 grams - almost an imperceptible difference in weight.
In addition, because of the flexible substrate, a reasonable person could read the Forma without having it always in a rigid cover, whereas I'd never recommend that with a glass-substrate reader like the Libra. So in practice the Forma is not only bigger and more resilient, but it can feel significantly lighter (since it can be used without a cover).
Personally, I'm not comfortable holding a naked Libra with its slippery plastic back as I have done systematically with the Forma with its slightly rubbery back. So I read with a covered Libra: total Libra weight 234 g, heavier than the naked Forma.
That might be due to my very dry and very arthritic hands. Others might have a better grip.

Another choice factor not mentioned here is that the Libra screen is crisper - probably a difference between plastic and glass.
anacreon is offline   Reply With Quote