View Single Post
Old 09-02-2019, 08:07 AM   #93
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timboli View Post
I don't know what I would think of it now, but I hated it when it came out. It realized none of the magic for me. I was youngish and no doubt my expectations were high, and it failed to deliver big time. Abysmal and truly awful in fact, are the memories I was left with.

But hey, I might love it now and think it artistic or something.
I didn't care much for the animated version of the Hobbit either and I saw it as an adult (1977) when I was in my full throat Tolkien phase. It was a TV special and the animation was done by a Japanese animation company. It was certainly a lot truer to the tone and spirit of the book than the Jackson movie, but it also had more of an Astroboy look and feel as well.

I tend to agree with Timboli, I really liked the Hobbit movies but considered them movies suggested by The Hobbit book, rather than an adaption of the book. Yes, the studio pushed Jackson into turning it into a trilogy for financial purposes, which meant that a whole lot of filler had to be thrown in. Jackson likely could have done it as a single long movie, or perhaps even two movies and stayed much truer to the book.

One of the issues with The Hobbit is that while the story starts off as a children's tale, it's more like the original dark Brothers Grimm tales than the light and airy Disney movies that kids are use to now. I'm not sure you can make a movie that is faithful to the book and have it be successful. The Hobbit was published in 1937. Children were very different back then than today's modern bubble wrapped children.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote