View Single Post
Old 09-02-2019, 07:36 AM   #607
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
My assumption is that people would see that my statement was talking about lower price buyers as a whole, your anecdotal and likely don't make an assumption false.
You made an absolute statement with no qualifiers. In the context of what we are talking about, maximizing publisher profits, I really don't follow why you would assume everyone understood you were only talking about low price buyers. Are you assuming that low price buyers drives book publishers bottom line? I doubt that assumption is true. It's been reported many, many times that best sellers drive the publishers bottom line and best sellers rarely are cheap books.

Any way you look at it, cheap books are very difficult to make money at. It takes a fixed amount of money to publish a book. The figure that I've seen is $50K. Given that the average book sells perhaps 10K-20K copies, then you know how much the average book has to cost to make that back. Add in the author's advance or author's cut, the sellers cut and one quickly sees that cheap books as more likely to lose money than make money.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote