View Single Post
Old 07-29-2019, 08:47 PM   #59
darryl
Wizard
darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
darryl's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
No idea what definition of common law you are using, but the definition of common law that I'm familiar with is

"the part of English law that is derived from custom and judicial precedent rather than statutes. Often contrasted with statutory law."

The US is for the most part a statutory law country, i.e. the law is defined by the legislature, not a common law, i.e. the law is defined by custom and judicial precedent. Judges may decide what a statute means and how to apply it, but in general they don't make it up whole cloth (there are exceptions).

There are some aspects of US law which is common law (tort law as an example), and yes US judges do looks at precedents to decide what a law means. However, it is also common for the legislature to clarify the law when a judge interprets the law in a, shall we say, unexpected manner.
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...784f4/download
darryl is offline   Reply With Quote