View Single Post
Old 07-21-2019, 11:14 AM   #233
KevinH
Sigil Developer
KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 8,884
Karma: 6120478
Join Date: Nov 2009
Device: many
Yes that is something I will definitely check. Qt does have routines to handle this and we even use them in places in the Sigil source. Perhaps for safety sake we could go back to using Qt's version of handling the update requests just for Sigil?


Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
Ouch. That sounds like that limits a plugin from even checking a file on https servers for update availability in general. Not just this plugin. Another thing to consider: I moved Sigil's update checker routines to embedded python calls quite a while ago. You may want to check if that's going to be a problem (or IS a problem now) on Macs.
KevinH is offline   Reply With Quote