Thread: Public Domain
View Single Post
Old 07-18-2019, 05:24 PM   #36
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,751
Karma: 206739468
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by SleepyBob View Post
Except that those are creations of Rowling, so would be covered by copyright.
Only the names (and only some of those) were her creations, not the ideas. She clearly based her "House Elves" on the Hob from English folklore. And the notion of a magic-less class of people looked down upon by those WITH magic was not her idea, only the term "muggle." So while you may not want to call them "House Elves," there's really nothing stopping someone from having household magical slave-like creatures that can be set free (or banished) by giving them articles of clothing (even in a book that has a wizarding school setting). Same for dementors. The word was not invented by Rowling. It's been used to describe evil fearsome creatures before and after Harry Potter. Owning ideas is much harder than people think. Rowling's characters may be her own, but she (and any author) will always have an uphill battle trying to claim ownership of ideas, settings, situations and the like (not that she's interested in trying).

Last edited by DiapDealer; 07-19-2019 at 08:11 AM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote