View Single Post
Old 03-09-2009, 04:15 PM   #52
JasonB
Connoisseur
JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.
 
JasonB's Avatar
 
Posts: 92
Karma: 15000
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony PRS-505
It's funny that nobody, so far, knows the actual answer to the question here. (noonscoomo from the Wizpac txtr thread might have a technical answer.) It seems to me that there's either a technical reason, or it's a matter of user studies.

It was actually one of the first things that I noticed when I saw my Sony the first time. I wondered to myself why it wasn't white, but gray instead. It hasn't detracted from my reading, and I hardly notice it at all any more. I don't know if I prefer it being gray or not - as I haven't ever seen one that's really white to be able to compare. It's fine to speculate that white may be easier or harder to read - but we may not know until somebody actually produces a truly white unit (if it's possible to do so) tests it.

I know I don't like the "glare" of white from LCD screens - but that's not a fair comparison. Is the glare from the colour or the technology? (Perhaps a little of both.)

I'm quite happy with the gray I do have - but I'd be very curious to get my hands on a white unit and see what I've been missing (or not).
JasonB is offline   Reply With Quote