View Single Post
Old 06-28-2019, 06:47 PM   #10
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 47,178
Karma: 169815798
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankrec View Post
That's what I'm complaining about. There should be a metric that would represent the quality and clarity of the displays text. I'm suggesting a name of "readability quotient", but it can be named however the industry see fit.
Given how subjective most people are about their ereading experiences, it would be fun to try to generate objective tests. Not to mention that since the eInk screens are manufactured by one company, there is little difference to be seen.

However, if you want to fund the quest to generate that set of objective tests, go ahead and have fun.

Please, think of some other name that is not already taken.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote