Why PageEdit is separated software?
By that I mean, why is it not included in the Sigil installation?
Okay, "Book View" was not viable, and his removal is inevitable and necessary .
Separating "Book View" into a new executable is therefore an excellent solution. This allows to clearly separate the development of Sigil from PageEdit.
But as buggy as it was, "Book View" was still a powerful feature, which had a number of advantages, and now we a 2 software programs that separated while they are complementary and would work wonders together.
Quote:
|
You can set PageEdit as "External XHTML Editor"
|
Yes, but no. I think that would be a waste. For me an "External XHTML Editor" would be a totally external software and very different from Sigil (an IDE for example), except PageEdit is a derivative of Sigil and is complementary to it.
Wouldn't it be better to include PageEdit in the Sigil installation and add next to the "External XHTML Editor" button, a "Open in PageEdit" button? This would maximize synergy.
Quote:
|
"There are also "Open with..."
|
No Open with... it's diversity and rescue tools.
Thank for reading.