Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks
It is that 'could use' part that scares the publishers and purveyors of the DRMing tools.
Unique (manufacturer/store) DRM is about making the wall taller-thicker, not protecting the content. It is about "You can only use books you bought HERE on this device." "Use only Factory parts or all warranties are void" has been used to peddle overpriced repair parts for years. It is all about Locking you into their business model.
DRM also stops the centuries old practice of lending books (ignore the digital duplicate may exist for a period issue. Amazon did come up with a partial solution, but only within their castle). The other part, is everybody in the DRM industry has their hand in the till. They want a FEEs, for every 'lend' or post sale activity, even though this is managed by a computer that is also doing the main, original DRM task (The computer is already running, shuffling a few extra bits needed to lend, cost minuscule $ to do. The $ was made doing the original DRM infesting, Licensing the device software and to the manufacturer).
The poor Author take the hit because Retailer A used a different DRM (or format) than brand K does and the Author had to agree to a contract to only sell thru A. DRM was supposed to protect the Author. It really protects the Seller.
|
Well, yes and no. Most ebook stores are quite willing to sell ebooks without DRM. Tor sells all their ebooks without DRM and they aren't the only ones. Of course, the proprietary DRM does lock one into a specific ebook store, which is just dandy with Amazon, Apple, B&N and Kobo.