View Single Post
Old 06-05-2019, 08:45 AM   #44
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,659
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
It's hard to define because it has no clear definition. Young adult is whatever the marketing department wants to flag as YA.
Right. Which is basically my entire objection in a nutshell. It's pointless as a descriptor.

Yes, I know all subgenre's are fuzzy and unclear, but it least they give a general idea as to what kind of content can be expected (scifi, fantasy, horror, thriller, etc...). The only thing the YA label brings to the table is: "expect young protags." That's it.

"What's the book about?"
"Youth."
"Good to know. Thanks."

It's not even a (sub)genre. Which is another aspect of my beef: it's being used like a genre/style when it's nothing but a marketing term that is largely useless to the reading world at large. People (youth included) look for books about something.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Whatever meaning the label might have once had is now lost in the rush for YA market dollars.
Agreed. Hence my complete unwillingness to acknowledge its usefulness to readers

Last edited by DiapDealer; 06-05-2019 at 08:48 AM.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote