View Single Post
Old 06-04-2019, 01:29 PM   #35
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,691
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
In general, YA are books targeted at people in certain age groups. Sometimes it's teens (13-16 say), other times it's middle schoolers (10-12), other times it's younger children. That's the definition that I think is the most accurate way to categorize such books.
I can't stress enough how odd it seems to me that anyone would use the word Adult--however modified--to refer to any of the age groups you mentioned. YA is sometimes targeted at children younger the 10-12?? How weird is that?

So, while I understand the marketing angle (though I don't believe many 10-16 year-old readers are truly influenced by publisher marketing sub-labels--perhaps it's their parents who are?), saying that books targeting 9-16 year-olds is the "most accurate way to categorize such books" makes no sense to me at all. In fact, YA would be the most inaccurate way I can think of to categorize such books.

I have no trouble believing that there's more adults searching out YA titles (as a subgenre) than there are children doing so.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote