Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor
You misunderstand me. I know you are not claiming that the width of the indentation is a bug.
|
OK.
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor
You have triggered a personal peeve. Basically, you have seen something you don't like and have decided it is a bug. This is far to common. In this case, you can attempt to justify it as an "off by 1" error. But, do you really think that no-one at Kobo looked at the screen and considered what it looked like? This is not a bug.
|
I don't call everything I don't like a bug (for example the header/footer size). I do justify it as an off by 1 error, and also possibly due to being used to arrays being numbered from 0. I've made this exact mistake myself in my ebook viewer before. As for Kobo noticing the bug, I barely noticed it myself at first. I just felt something was off, and when I first attempted to increase the indent using em spaces (which the default font does not support), I saw the replacement boxes, which made me realize why it looked off before. Only after this did I even consider it might be due to extra indentation (otherwise, I probably would have just thought I was seeing imaginary problems).