Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodRagg
Is it so much effort to benchmark a couple of cards, that you assume that I have not read the thread ? I even wrote an app for it, so the least you can do is give me a little credit. Those IOzone results tell more than those posted on the internet as i highly doubt they ran on Kobo's.
If you run into trouble, I am more than willing to help you out.
|
In one of the previous posts i did mention the boot time and 4k performance(which translates iops) of a 32GB Evo Plus and Sandisk Extreme 128GB, so it seemed to me that you just did a quick google or didnt pay attention.I was just getting up from sleep, and that might contributed to my reply seeming bit hard, sry if it is so
.
While the sandisk extreme cards do have the A2 rating, they dont seem to perform at that level, android police tested it, and my own tests also confirm it. Maybe they could get to that level by using their own Sandisk Extreme Card reader, i dont know as i dont have it.But as of the moment i dont have any proof that they are better than the Samsung Evo Plus, so its not logical to me to pay more for an A2 card, thus my recommendation.
Ofcourse that thorough testing on the device would net best results(including different cluster sizes) but the idea was to offer an simple solution to zodwallop. As with only copying the image and expanding it afterwards to the new size with partition wizard, i got better usability results with a Samsung Evo Plus 32GB, compared to Sandisk Extreme A2 128GB.