View Single Post
Old 04-21-2019, 12:34 PM   #202
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by darryl View Post
@pwalker8. I have little experience so far as publishing contracts are concerned. Kris Rusch does. As does PG of the Passive Voice blog fame. He commented somewhat flippantly at the end of the post HERE that:



I quote Kris Rusch because what she says makes sense. She points out the built-in conflict of interest between the agent's interest in maintaining good relationships with publishers and representing their client's interest. Or of course their own interests. Nate over at the Digital Reader posted THIS recently. The conduct described in the notable quote immediately below would seem to amount to criminal conduct if the agreement is not disclosed to the client.



THIS link illustrates a case where no disclosure seems to have been made.

This does not of course mean that all agents are bad. But it does illustrate the dangers inherent in dealing with even larger well respected agencies. Most authors seem to get on very well with their agents right up until the point things go sour.

Kris Rusch also points out that agents seldom hold legal qualifications, and may well be breaking the law when they advise on and negotiate contracts. My current view, admittedly as an outsider, is that only authors who are seeking traditional publication need an agent, and only then to reach publishers who essentially deal only through agents or even particular agents. I would advise any author who goes this way to retain a lawyer to advise and negotiate any contract which may result, though I expect many agents will prove to be resistant to doing so.

Like I say, one mid tier disgruntled author doesn't counter the hundreds of successful authors who public thank their agents whenever they produce a new book in my mind. Yes, I understand the "conflict of interest" theory. I see that mentioned with regards to real estate agents as well. Perhaps it's true for poor agents, but good agents understand that having good word of mouth from satisfied clients requires giving the client good advice and working in the client's best interest.

There is a reason that your basic random contract lawyer who doesn't understand the business may not be your best bet for contract negotiations. Someone who knows the business is more likely to understand what is the norm and what the true gotcha's are. Plus each author is a little different in what they want.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote