View Single Post
Old 04-19-2019, 06:19 PM   #607
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Whatever floats your boat. I merely note that all my gadgets that have said SDCH only, limit 32 GB, have all happily used (the total capacity) of reformatted (to fat 32) 64, 128, 256, and 512 GB chips, even when they can't read any exfat formatted chip.
The fact that they can read up to 512GB chips when formatted FAT32 but not when formatted exFAT is a real curiosity. I can understand not grokking something like NTFS - to get that I had to install software under Android that required root - it exposed the Linux ntfs-3g support built into the Linux kernel but not normally exposed under Android.

But exFAT is simply the next evolution of FAT to handle even larger file systems. Current devices should support it. Older devices may have been released before it became widespread. (Imperfect memory says the main difference between exFAT and FAT32 is a rather larger cluster size.)

It works for you, so I'm happy, even if I don't understand it.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote