View Single Post
Old 04-03-2019, 05:29 PM   #263
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
Even privately-held companies can have shareholders--just not public ones. That doesn't really change their fiduciary duty. And the "health of the company" is usually not measured in ways other than financial, when it comes to investors, shareholders, stockholders, etc.

Hitch
Health of the company tends to be measured in long term profitability, i.e ability to survive rather than quarterly profits or stock prices. There is quite a bit of debate going on right now about what fiduciary duty actually means. The idea that companies should maximize profit was really a reaction whose best known advocate was Milton Friedman to Keynesian economics. To a certain extent, I think it is really an exaggeration of what Friedman was trying to say and frankly was seize on by investors who are more focused on short term returns to investors than the long term survival of a company. You really have to look at what the norm in corporate governance was when Friedman was talking about profit, not where we are now.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote