View Single Post
Old 03-18-2019, 07:58 AM   #25
Quoth
Still reading
Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Quoth's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,588
Karma: 108669873
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
For me personally, the point at which I stop being able to tell the difference on a reading device occurs somewhere between 250 and 300ppi. I could see a clear difference in smoothness going from a 167 to a 260ppi screen, but no improvement going from 260 to 300.
It also depends on display technology, font hinting, anti-aliasing etc. Even 200 dpi in one bit monochrome is ghastly. Yet 122dpi on an LCD with sub-pixel addressing, anti-aliasing and good hinting can look about the same as 300 dpi on eInk for sharpness, though even a 167dpi eink is less tiring to read for two reasons*
The eink has no sub-pixel addressing and very poor ability to do anti-aliasing as the 6 to 14 shades of grey between black and white are problematic. So eInk, like a sharp laser printer benefits more from higher resolutions than full range colour/greyscale screens.

*
1) Ability to hold it at your own ideal distance, tricky for a Laptop or PC, though possible with a phone or tablet.
2) Ambient light illuminated displays are easier on the eye than light emitting. Even an eInk front light is poorer than decent ambient light.
Quoth is offline   Reply With Quote