View Single Post
Old 03-17-2019, 04:50 PM   #15
RbnJrg
Wizard
RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,830
Karma: 8700631
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Rosario - Santa Fe - Argentina
Device: Kindle 4 NT
Quote:
Originally Posted by kso View Post

Tables, as suggested by Hitch, or display:table (row, cell) as suggested by RbnJrg, do not work in my case. As soon as one of the images in a row is set to be a slightly more than 50% of the column width, bang, up it blows to 100% width, and the other one is squashed like a bean stalk and, listen to this, shoved into the margin beside the table (if you ever need to position something in the margin, you now know how it's done).
If the added width of your two images is less than 100% then you shouldn't have such issues. You need to employ a table of two columns; what are you using now? If you gives a image a width of 55% and the other a width of 43% (and the table has a width of 100%), and you put the images in different columns and still you have troubles, there must be something wrong with your code. Can you post here two of your probematic images?
RbnJrg is offline   Reply With Quote