Thread: Sigil-0.9.12 Released
View Single Post
Old 03-02-2019, 10:42 AM   #109
RbnJrg
Wizard
RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,857
Karma: 8821117
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Rosario - Santa Fe - Argentina
Device: Kindle 4 NT
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
What are those issues (aside from your concerns over memory increases measured in 100s of MBs)?

If there are still major performance issues after a clean install with no saved preferences at all (and by major, I mean seeing "Not Responding" messages), then we need to start looking at issues with particular video drivers and other installed software. The fact of the matter is: there are lots people using the latest Sigil on Windows 10 and Windows 7 who are not experiencing any of these major performance issues. The number of those who are (and have reported them) is extremely low. This suggests that the issue does not lie with Sigil per se, but perhaps with issues that Sigil's new version of Qt has with particular hardware drivers or software on the machines that are having difficulty.
Well, regrettably, I had to downgrade to Sigil 0.9.10 It's practicably impossible for me to open two instances of Sigil 0.9.12; the program takes (the two instances) about 1.4GB of memory after a half an hour of work and Sigil becames slow and with many "Not respond" messages. With Sigil 0.9.10 that didn't happen (and is not happening). Maybe the new version of Qt is eating a lot of memory.
RbnJrg is offline   Reply With Quote