Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward
Which means there is no "hard and fast" limitation to what the government can do. . .
|
Right. Though why that's relevant to why copyright IS or ISN'T property completely eludes me. First you argue something
isn't property because "government" ... and then you argue government might <something> because "property." The entire thread of your "argument" (a word I'm going to use loosely) is very difficult to cling to. It's like you're asking if I walk to school or pack my lunch.
Since what is property and what the government can (or does) do with property are two distinct discussions, I fail to see why you insist on conflating them.