View Single Post
Old 01-11-2019, 10:42 AM   #395
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,768
Karma: 206758686
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Really? Explain to me the difference. Both are defined term contracts. One between a lender and a person, and the other between a creator (sic) and the sum of all people in a jurisdiction.
What a government (or any other entity) can|should|may do with said property has zero bearing on whether or not it can be considered "property" (legally or etymologically). We already have different forms of property that are treated differently by governments. So you claiming a mortgage can qualify as "property" (abeit a "different kind") is well and good, but asking what that would mean in terms of potential governmental treatment of same "does not follow." It could mean anything. Just like it already does. There is no hard and fast property to government treatment formula.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote