Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
I don't. You cite an organization dedicated to treating the various forms of government granted monopolies (copyright and patents) as property as the authoritarian expert on the definition of property. Certainly, it's the definition that they would like to have accepted by everyone.
|
OK, I gotta ask--US Law, International law, and myriad other sources and authorities all
define copyright as property. Period. That's established, and
not subject to argument.
Is your point that you don't
agree with the existing law and rulings, so you're simply posting your thoughts on the matter, or are you actually trying to say...what? That none of the legal authorities, the US Congress, treaties, etc., have the right to define it as property?
I mean...what's the discussion you're trying to have, here?
Hitch