Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor
Did you read the post I quoted? And have requoted and deliberately split a bit. The second sentence is what I was referring to. That is what is apparently missing a "not". Or maybe a "that" should be a "not". Or just overall better grammar.
|
I did. And still understood what the OP wanted. All through the thread. Several places you seemed confused at what was being said based on your reply. It didn't make sense. In my read through of the thread, the other replies made sense according to the issue mentioned in the OP. I was just trying to point that out. Not trying to start an argument.
Sometimes I read through an entire thread and one person seems to be missing something based on their replies....I was just trying to stop the misunderstanding from continuing.