Quote:
Originally Posted by Doitsu
@Tex2002ans Can you please check the Hairston sentences with Antidote 9?
|
Missed: (49/67)
Correct: (14/67)
19 (company's)
30 (fee, however,)
35 (anyone)
36 (kinds)
40 (have)
41 (It's)
42 (gone)
46 (can)
53 (is)
56 (affect)
61 (predict)
62 (were)
63 (its)
65 (doesn't)
Bogus: (1/67)
17
--- It thought "french" and "german" were unknown words. Although it's strange, because other books I tested on it lets me know French/German are usually capitalized.
Potential: (1/67)
50 I was last employed by (Texas Instruments) company.
--- It knew "texas instruments" should've been capitalized. I could see how a strange proper noun like that could throw this sentence off.
Wrong: (2/67)
21 When Mitchell moved, he (bring) his secretary with him
58 Senator (davits) (come) from (New York)
--- I had no idea
"davits" is even a word.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch
My point being that her test--isn't. She didn't see most of the errata that Grammarly may have caught, because she's on the other side of the paywall, firstly, and never drilled down, secondly.
|
Yeah, I would definitely want a true apples-to-apples comparison.
And the formatting on that article was absolutely
atrocious. All the images made is absolutely impossible to follow what was what. Would be helpful if there was a nice formatted list at the end.
Mind running it through paid-for Grammarly and see how it fares on the Hairston examples?