Quote:
Originally Posted by jcsalomon
Following the discussion on the EPUB lists, seems 3.2 is their way of saying, “3.1 was a mistake; nobody uses it, and for good reason; so let’s find a way that complies with standarization rules to roll everything back to 3.01.”
|
They say it almost textually on
Github:
Quote:
The next revision of EPUB 3 will be EPUB 3.2, which seeks to update EPUB 3.1 to make a successor that is compatible with EPUB 3.0.1 (i.e., that reverts the package document version number change introduced in 3.1).
Creators of EPUB content are advised not to implement 3.1, but to continue to create content compatible with EPUB 3.0.1 until work on EPUB 3.2 is complete.
|
And in
here, you can see the summary of the situation.