Quote:
Originally Posted by gmw
So I've come away from it thinking that Atwood built the theory and then did almost everything she could to make it ambiguous - and that was the primary role for Jeremiah/DuPont. In a pure fiction story I'd have said it was a waste of a good character, in this ... I still thought it was a waste of a good character.
|
As with Bookpossum, I thought it a shame Grace didn't take him up on his offer. I think that's also a comment on Victorian mores especially as regards women, an essential passivity and unwillingness as well as inability to break out of social constraints. A book about Jeremiah would have been more interesting!
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmw
|
Grace made enough tangential comments about Jamie that I knew there had to be a payoff, eventually. Like you, it doesn't mean I bought it, though.
I recently finished a very good novel myself where the protagonist, having come to the end of her resources and committed a murder, waited for the authorities to come and take care of her. I think it also ties back to Victorian times and why the workhouses were so very horrible; so no one would be tempted to go there unless they truly were at the end. The extremely demeaning and ungenerous attitude of the privileged and powerful, of course!