View Single Post
Old 11-15-2018, 11:20 PM   #1232
sufue
lost in my e-reader...
sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sufue ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 8,233
Karma: 67800338
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: sunny southern California, USA
Device: Android phone, Sony T1, Nook ST Glowlight, Galaxy Tab 7 Plus
Well, actually, I may have been wrong about it being the Brits. It actually appears to just be the way the Economist refers to itself, independent of its being a British publication: https://www.economist.com/the-econom...lf-a-newspaper

My bad...

Regarding the "briefs" - all I can say is, again, that's what the Economist itself referred to them as. I would sort of assume (although I just had to take a "my bad" for assuming ) that this might be short for "briefing"? Or maybe just refers to the fact that they are not very many pages - i.e. brief?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GtrsRGr8 View Post
I'll try to remember that in future posts that I read, and that I publish, of British "newspapers."

So, do the Brits use the word "magazine?" If so, what do they mean by it?

"Briefs" is not a familiar word to us Yanks, either, unless you're talking about an article of men's clothing. If I had to say, I would say that they are what American scholars refer to as "monographs."
sufue is offline   Reply With Quote