View Single Post
Old 11-15-2018, 11:23 AM   #36
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,929
Karma: 169810634
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.p.s View Post
Are you claiming that the serious adverse effects of drunk driving are limited to the drunk driver? (And there is also the second hand smoke thing.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZodWallop View Post
Laws against driving drunk aren't put in place for the drunk's own good.
I was simply pointing out the hypocrisy of quite a few people who are willing to claim that attempting to prevent the use of drugs in prison is an unacceptable violation of the prisoner's rights while fining and/or jailing impaired drivers and smokers is somehow acceptable.

If we are willing to allow access to drugs in prison given the known side effects of drugs, is it not somewhat logical to argue that imposing limitations on impaired driving or smoking is an equally unacceptable violation of civil rights. Owsley's finest blotter for all!

BTW, latest statistics seem to show that distracted driving is even more of a killer than impaired driving yet it doesn't have the opprobrium associated with impaired driving.

Last edited by DNSB; 11-15-2018 at 11:27 AM.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote